When representatives of NATO nations meet in The Hague late next month, they’re expected to dramatically hike the alliance’s defence spending target for members—the one Canada is failing to hit already.
At the last NATO summit in Washington last year, allies lined up to call out Canada for failing to meet the alliance defence spending target of two percent of national GDP.
When Prime Minister Mark Carney attends the NATO summit next month, he’ll likely be under pressure to commit to a new defence spending target of five percent of national GDP.
“We’re such an outlier now,” said David Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute. He said Canada will face a “massive challenge” in meeting the new target.
U.S. President Donald Trump has said for months he wants to see NATO countries increase their defence spending to five percent of GDP.
On Monday, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said he believes allied nations will agree at next month’s gathering to a new target of five percent.
Related Stories
Annual NATO data shows Canada is still failing to reach its current commitment; defence spending amounted to just 1.3 percent of GDP in 2024. Canada also failed to meet the alliance’s target for equipment spending.
“The last time that there were reported stats, we were one of only two not meeting either (pledge). Everybody else meets at least one,” Perry said. “We’re increasingly, extraordinarily isolated in how far behind everyone else we are.”
Laval University international relations professor Anessa Kimball said Canada should be preparing to argue that investing more in the military becomes much harder in the middle of a trade war.
Kimball said Ottawa should prepare to leverage Trump’s calls for higher military spending in the alliance and use that to press the case against his tariff agenda.
Kimball, who wrote a book on defence burden-sharing among NATO members, also said Carney may have a ready-made excuse for missing the NATO target.
As governor of the Bank of England, Carney was busy in the U.K. managing the economic fallout from Brexit when Justin Trudeau was in power and directing Canada’s military spending.
“While I think that gives him an important level of macroeconomic credibility, it also gives him a little bit of an out. Essentially he can say, ‘Trudeau and the Liberal Party left me a bit of a mess and they’ve known that they had to do this,’” Kimball said.
“Carney couldn’t do worse at being convincing as Trudeau was. Trudeau was entirely unconvincing last year.”
At the 2024 NATO summit in Washington, after a series of U.S. politicians blasted Canada for failing to meet its commitments, Trudeau pledged to reach the two percent target by 2032.
His government suggested this could be done by buying up to 12 new submarines—a procurement project for which no deadline was ever given.
Trudeau said at the time that Canada’s defence spending was based on its needs, “not some nominal targets that make for easy headlines and accounting practices, but don’t actually make us automatically safer.”
During the spring election campaign, Carney pledged to reach two percent by 2030.
“The government was elected on a strong mandate to rebuild Canada’s defence capacity, rearm the Canadian Armed Forces and invest in the Canadian defence industry,” said Laurent de Casanove, a spokesperson for Defence Minister David McGuinty.
“The prime minister was clear that this government will invest to put Canada on track to exceed our NATO defence spending target before 2030.”
But Perry said Carney likely will have very little wiggle room at The Hague, even in a room full of allies who know he’s new to the job.
“I think, unfairly for him, there’s probably not a lot (of room),” he said. “Even though he’s brand-new, this commitment for Canada isn’t. It’s over a decade old.”
